Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.
Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.
Decision Maker: Asset Management and Economic Development Portfolio Holder
Decision published: 22/06/2021
Effective from: 18/06/2021
Decision:
Details of decision:
The Portfolio Holder approves Somerset West and Taunton Council’s submission of a bid into the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government’s Levelling Up bid, entitled “A Vision for Tonedale”
Reasons for proposed decision:
This Levelling Up bid provides an opportunity for Somerset West and Taunton, working in partnership with many partners, stakeholders, and the community at large to deliver benefits in community and commercial sectors, education and apprenticeships, health and wellbeing, employment opportunities and environmental improvements, whilst simultaneously meeting many of the Levelling Up outputs under the regeneration and cultural criteria.
Tonedale Mill and the surrounding green spaces and waterways are integral to the fabric of Wellington both as a place and as crucially in its identity. The deterioration of the nationally significant industrial fabric and infrastructure whilst in private ownership has reached a critical point, but it is not too late. The Levelling Up bid can combine the needs of the community with the salvation of the natural and built assets to the benefit of all.
Consultation to date:
Regular updates have been provided to the Wellington Town Council and Langford Budville Parish Council. Significant local stakeholders and consultation has occurred through our partnership with the Wellington Mills CIC.
WMCIC was established in 2018. In January 2021 SWT signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the group to formalise and demonstrate the joint commitment to the heritage and environment of Wellington. They have completed multiple rounds of community consultation for the sites and may become end users for parts of each project.
SWT are also working closely with community sports, cultural and leisure groups who are interested in or who would benefit from the community land consolidation project.
Alternative funding options sourced:
The submission into the Levelling up fund bid does refer to a number of match funding contributions that have been made by SWT, including capital and revenue expenditure. This funding is already committed and/or spent and does not require further approval.
There is no financial ask of SWT in the Levelling Up fund. A report to Full Council will follow the submission to request that should the bid be successful, a supplementary capital budget is created to allow the spend of the monies on the projects described. The LUF proposal stipulates that some of the funds must be spent in financial year 21/22, hence this paper seeks approval to spend the funds if successful ahead of time to allow time for procurement and design to take place.
The below has been completed:
|
Name(s) |
Date |
Relevant ward councillor(s) consulted |
Cllr Janet Lloyd Cllr Keith Wheatley Cllr Andrew Govier Cllr Vivienne Stock-Williams Cllr Mark Lithgow |
01.06.21 |
The following are if appropriate / applicable: Yes/No. If yes the implications should be attached to this decision notice.
|
||
Finance implications
|
No further finance implications on the submission |
|
Legal implications
|
No further implications on the submission |
|
Links to corporate aims
|
Yes |
17.06.21 |
Climate and Sustainability implications
|
No further implications on the submission |
17.06.21 |
Community Safety Implications |
No further implications on the submission |
17.06.21 |
Equalities Impact
Safeguarding Implications |
No further implications on the submission |
17.06.21 |
Risk management
|
Yes |
17.06.21 |
Partnership implications |
Yes. |
17.06.21 |
Any conflicts of interest declared by Leader or Executive Members consulted on the proposed decision. If Yes provide confirmation from Chief Executive to grant dispensation for the Leader’s / Executive Member’s views to be considered.
Decision Maker: Taunton Charter Trustees
Made at meeting: 25/05/2021 - Taunton Charter Trustees
Decision published: 16/06/2021
Effective from: 25/05/2021
Decision:
Councillor Hazel Prior-Sankey proposed and Councillor Lee Baker seconded:-
"That the best thanks of the Charter Trustees be accorded to Councillor Francesca Smith for the manner in which she has discharged the duties of the office of Mayor of the Town during her two terms of office".
The motion was carried unanimously.
Councillor Smith replied and thanked the Charter Trustees for their kind words. It had been a wonderful two years to represent the Town as Mayor and an opportunity and privilege she would never forget. Being Taunton born and bred, she had thought she knew everything about the town, but she had been pleasantly surprised at all the work that is done by volunteers, charities, and businesses to raise funds, provide entertainment and the work that keeps the town vibrant and an interesting place to live. The Mayor had been fortunate to attend so many events, from opening shops and businesses to attending concerts, to switching on lights, both virtually and in person, it has been amazing.
Decision Maker: Taunton Charter Trustees
Made at meeting: 25/05/2021 - Taunton Charter Trustees
Decision published: 16/06/2021
Effective from: 25/05/2021
Decision:
The purpose of the item was to appoint Charter Trustees, from nominations received from each group, to serve on the Standing Committee for the year 2020/2021.The proposed ‘Powers and Duties’ of the Standing Committee were set out in the attached document to the Agenda.
If the Committee allocated politically proportionally as per the Standing Orders there would be 6 Liberal Democrats and 1 Labour seat, though it was always within the gift of the political groups as to whether they took up their full entitlement.
RESOLVED that the following Councillors were appointed to the Standing Committee of the Taunton Charter Trustees for 2021/2022;
- Councillor Chris Booth
- Councillor Simon Coles
- Councillor Sue Lees
- Councillor Libby Lisgo
- Councillor Derek Perry
- Councillor Martin Peters
- Councillor Alan Wedderkopp
Decision Maker: Taunton Charter Trustees
Made at meeting: 25/05/2021 - Taunton Charter Trustees
Decision published: 16/06/2021
Effective from: 25/05/2021
Decision:
The Mayor opened the meeting, and invited her chaplain, Reverend Debbi Turley, to open the meeting with a short prayer.
Councillor Richard Lees proposed and Councillor Simon Coles seconded the following motion, which was carried unanimously.
RESOLVED:
"That Councillor Susan Lees be elected Mayor of Taunton for the ensuing year".
Councillor Susan Lees then repeated and signed the Declaration of Acceptance of Office.
The Mayor addressed the Charter Trustees and stated she had an ambition to be the best she can be, and to bring some cheer in what has been a difficult period.
Decision Maker: Taunton Charter Trustees
Made at meeting: 25/05/2021 - Taunton Charter Trustees
Decision published: 16/06/2021
Effective from: 25/05/2021
Decision:
(Minutes of the meeting of the Taunton Charter Trustees held on 16th March 2021 were circulated with the agenda)
RESOLVED that the minutes of the Taunton Charter Trustees held on 16th March 2021 were confirmed as a correct record.
Decision Maker: Community Portfolio Holder
Decision published: 08/06/2021
Effective from: 16/06/2021
Decision:
Details of decision: British Telecommunications plc (BT) has recently contacted the Council concerning proposals to remove four public call boxes within the Somerset West and Taunton area.
With the spread of mobile telephone communications the need for public telephone boxes has significantly declined over the past few years and is likely to continue leading to the current proposal. The telephone box the subject of this proposal has been monitored for 12 months by BT and very low usage (in many cases no use at all) has been recorded.
Consultations with the appropriate Ward Councillors and Parish Councils have taken place within the last couple of months and the responses received confirm a wish to raise an objection to the removal have been added into the attached Schedule.
This Schedule formed a ‘draft’ decision which had to be notified to both BT and the Secretary of State.
A further round of consultation has been undertaken before the end of May 2021 before this ‘final’ decision in respect of the telephone boxes identified is being issued by the Council as the ‘Relevant Public Body’.
At this final stage, Executive Councillor Chris Booth has agreed that the final decision should be published and sent to BT and the Secretary of State.
.
Reasons for proposed decision: BT has been assessing usage of public telephone boxes in the Somerset West and Taunton Area and has found that these boxes have not been used at all during the last year or on such an infrequent basis that it is simply not worthwhile keeping the boxes listed operational.
Alternative funding options sourced: None
The below has been completed:
|
Name(s) |
Date |
Relevant ward councillor(s) consulted |
Cllrs Firmin, Darch, Sully, Whetlor, Aldridge, Davies, Morgan, Milne |
19/03/21 |
The following are if appropriate / applicable: Yes/No. If yes the implications should be attached to this decision notice.
|
||
Finance implications
|
None |
|
Legal implications
|
None |
|
Links to corporate aims
|
None |
|
Community Safety implications
|
Where local communities have expressed concerns about the loss of call boxes within an area –say with poor mobile reception – the Council has supported the request to lodge an objection against the removal of the call box. |
|
Environmental implications |
Aesthetically some boxes are likely to be adopted to maintain the current street scene. |
|
Equalities Impact
|
None |
|
Safeguarding Implications |
None |
|
Risk management
|
None |
|
Partnership implications |
None |
|
Any conflicts of interest declared by Leader or Executive Members consulted on the proposed decision. If Yes provide confirmation from Chief Executive to grant dispensation for the Leader’s / Executive Member’s views to be considered.
Not Applicable